Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I just loaded ANM 4.1 and imported my ACE modules and I am seeing some odd behavior in the Operations/Virtual servers tab. My virtual servers are showing up with multiple different VIP addresses under the IP Address:Protocol:Port.For Example VIP-WEB-...
I am running an ACE with A2(1.4a) in bridged mode. We are currently experiencing issues with both PASV and Active FTP. When the client connects and issues a PORT command the ACE doesn't loadbalance this to the rserver causing the client to hang. T...
I would like to deploy multiple contexts on my ace. I am wondering if I can use the same management vlan for all of them or do i need to use different vlans? I would like to use mulitple contexts behind one fwsm for product management reasons, but...
I am replacing my primary ACE blade and am wondering if when I reconfigure the admin context with the ft groups will I have any issues syncing the secondary back to the primary? I don't want to run the risk of a blank config from the new primary bla...
I have a global pat for a clients subnet to access the internet and a static nat for a specific host to host connection accross a site to site vpn. I recently added another static nat w/ access list and now the host can't access the internet. The c...
David,I just implemented the stickyness and the problem still exists. Seems like the loadbalancer just decides not to pass the PORT command sporadically.Doug
Hi David,I am using the same config, except the stickyness. Let me try that out. I have tried about everything imaginable, but overlooked the stickyness since it shouldn't really be necessary for this. What train of code are you using?Doug
1 more question, should the admin context be in an FT group? We currently don't have this configured because the configuration documentation was vague on this.thanks
