Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have a situation where some overly helpful staff have installed the posture module on clients that don't yet need it. Because we are phasing it into a legacy network, it's difficult to isolate them and to fully explain our situation, but the prob...
We have an ISE 3.1 implementation with Catalyst 9200L switches. Everything works great, including auth & posture through our VOIP phones (NEC phones). EAPOL forwarding is enabled on the phone.The problem we're seeing periodically is when a computer...
I had a bit of a surprise making some changes to our planned NAC setup, and I want to make sure this is not a bug and is an expected behavior. It's great if this is "normal".We have 9200L access switches and ISE 3.1 in place. The switch ports use d...
I'm moving our ACS from 4.2.1 to 5.5 and I'm not having problems with most of it. In fact, I like most of the changes in ACS 5.5. One thing I'm stumped on (for now).In ACS 4.2.x, we can create a user, have that user authenticate with AD, LDAP, inte...
I've stumped myself, and think I've been staring at this too long. I have our ASA configured so that when an AnyConnect client connects, before any username or password is entered, the correct group is selected for the client in the "Group" field. ...
I'm hoping I may have solved my own problem. I noticed a couple clients' posture states are stuck in "pending", although I don't know why the phone might influence that. Perhaps the phone is incidental. I followed these instructions and hope it fi...
Have you checked out Work Centers - Posture - Policy Elements - Requirements? Along with that you would use the Remediations section just above it (I'm referencing ISE 3.1). Seems like this could be the direction you need. There will be more to it...
We ran into this problem with the 2.2 eval OVA. Now we're trying the latest 2.3 OVA from July with the same problem. We can't eval ISE if the VMs aren't stable. Are there any patches or workarounds? There are no snaphost being done to the 2.3 VM.
