Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I really don't know why I bother anymore, since Cisco never provided ANY useful answers on questions, but I still try it:1. This bug indeed leads to a load of malicious attachments not passed to the file analysis, but sent to the end users. This is a...
I don't think this is a "logging issue only" - since based on this logging, the appliance sends alert emails that are the only valid way of monitoring the health of the system. And if the monitoring of a system is generating constant false positives,...
Just to make clear what that bug does and why ... Due to this bugs, ESA deletes perfectly valid and wanted emails (that are also DMARC valid) just completely. And why? Just because of a clearly faulty DMARC implementation. The Rfc clearly states not ...
... and unfortunately they've an ongoing history of implementing new features in a way that throw a lot of alarm mails in General Deployment Releases, and only then finetune after productive customers get loads of false alerts ...
So, why are you constantly sending alerts for an expected behaviour? In my understanding, alerts are for unexpected behaviour, not for expected one!How are we supposed to monitor the device with continous bogus alerts for expected behaviour?
Hello,no, unfortunately I’ve never received any feedback from cisco on this … Also unfortunately, that seems to be their default support mode …Instead of answering, they seem to have hidden the bug again – at least I now get a message that I do not h...
