Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have a policy set with 751 policies, and this has become so much of a problem that we can't find, nor delete, any policies anymore.We're already using Firefox.Any chance of having usable filtering inside authorization policy sets anytime soon? Tha...
I did. And it worked like a charm!Thank you, @balaji.bandi.So: To reply to @abhiram:1st step:Be aware that Gi1/0/X will become Gi2/0/X and vice versa, but the configurations will stay with the port numbers, not the physical ports. This goes for EVERY...
Ah! As it reconfigures the stack, I was naturally looking in config mode. Also, the documentation I found, stated that it should be done in mode, but WHICH mode was missing. The switches are:2x C9300L-48UXG-4X1x C9300L-48PF-4X...and they're already ...
You hit the nail on the head - the new switches are C9300L UXG's, the older one (current master) a standard C9300L.I'm happy to hear I'm on the right track. Port configs should be copied to where they're going to be after reload. Physically, only the...
You kind of just described my latest use case: I have a 3-switch stack in a new building an hour away. The stack was first implemented with a switch we had in stock, just to start connecting building automation, still during building. Later, the orde...
Why does the reason for renumbering matter? If renumbering just makes my stack neater, that's my decision, right? Reprioritizing the stack members is a different cup of tea altogether, and the two have different use cases. How about simply answering ...
