About ijdasjdiasjdoi

ijdasjdiasjdoi · 08-10-2012

Hi,we are using two ASA5540 (8.4(4)) as a load-balanced VPN-Cluster. Primarily the cluster is used for layer-2 customer VPN using Cisco VPN-Client IPSEC.Now the followeing constellation applies:ASAs have a outside interface each that is used for the ...

ijdasjdiasjdoi · 08-13-2012

Thanks for your suggestion.But I don't see any change in my design that would help in this situation.The ASA needs an (sub)interface in every vlan, that should be accessible via a Layer2-VPN. Otherwise the ASA wouls not even receive any return-packet...

ijdasjdiasjdoi · 08-13-2012

What do you mean by "A redesign is probably the better solution"?Is this scenario not possible with ASAs?I know that Cisco's ISR like 2900-series do not have any problems with asymetric routing in this constellation. ASAs differ from those a lot.

ijdasjdiasjdoi · 08-13-2012

Thanks for your support.This may be a solution if I just had one customer on this ASA.But actually we are consolidating VPN-Routers onto the ASA-Cluster, so I cannot just set one default tunneled route.Is it possible to let ASA route traffic based o...

ijdasjdiasjdoi · 08-10-2012

The load-balancing is not the problem. Maybe just sick with there's just one ASA.Here's a simple topology with the ASA, backbone and customer network:When the VPN-Client sends packet to e.g. 173.194.35.159 (google.de), ASA routes that packet accordin...

Member Since	‎08-10-2012 04:34 AM
Date Last Visited	‎10-08-2024 02:24 AM
Posts	5

User Statistics

User Activity

L2VPN with ASA5540 and asymetric routing

L2VPN with ASA5540 and asymetric routing

L2VPN with ASA5540 and asymetric routing

Re: L2VPN with ASA5540 and asymetric routing

L2VPN with ASA5540 and asymetric routing