Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello everyone.I have two questions, which I posted at the end of the thread on the document for BFD. They don't seem to be getting noticed, so I'll repeat them here: 1) What are the exact statements which determine if my bundle of physical ports i...
Dear Cisco:
I want to like the CLI analyzer tool. I really do. I like the concept, and it is often helpful. I have two feature requests (which maybe are just things I've missed in the documentation):
1) Linux edition. This shouldn't be that h...
I've read Xander's document and worked with it in the field, so I thought I knew that Netflow packets have to export via a line card interface (i.e. a port which is directly addressible in the switch fabric). Recently, however, a colleague presented...
I'm surprised at how many knobs I don't see for configuring the ATM interface on my 9k. Perhaps this bodes ill for my effort.
I am not getting ILMI to come-up, and odd errors related to AAL5 padding length. Here are some outputs:
show atm int atm...
On an ASR 9010 running IOS-XR 5.3.3 (freshly turbo-booted):
policy-global glbLocationCommunity '6', glbDefaultCustomer '100'end-global
route-policy test1 set community $glbLocationCommunity additiveend-policy
route-policy test3($p) set local-prefere...
Hello everyone.I have two questions: 1) What are the exact statements which determine if my bundle of physical ports is running BoB or BLB? 2) If all the physical ports in my bundle are on the same LC and serviced by the same NPU,a) Do I still need t...
Hello Xander. Based on your document and other sources, I've long understood that exported netflow stats had to egress via a line card, that the egress port had to be directly addressable by the switching fabric. There was a sensible rational, and i...
No, I don't really need ILMI. It was just a first-attempt to see if anything was going to work.
Problem was isolated to bad hardware on the ATM switch.
ERM
I foresee confusion. I would rather see 6.x.x (aka 64bit XR or eXR), and take the 32bit code (classic XR) without trident support to 7.x.x. Next major release of eXR would then get numbered 8.x.x, and so forth.
Is it too late?
ERM
