Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We recently saw this article:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml***snippet***Understand Special Queues With Non-RSP Platform As noted in the Packet Prioritization Tags and Queuing table, Cisco rout...
I have the Cisco Press QOS book and here is a snippet: Pg. 297"the policy-map queue-voip policy assigns VOIP traffic 50 percent of the bandwidth based on the bandwidth 50 percent command. But 50 percent of what? Well, the actual bandwidth is derived ...
Greetings.We have two data centers. At each location, at the outside edge, is a firewall. Just inside of the firewall is a distribution router (ABR). Just inside of the distribution routers are the Core routers, which have Gig links to each other. Th...
Greeetings.I have a quick question: You have Router-A as an ABR touching Areas 0 and 1. Area 1 is an NSSA area. In Area 1, you have Router-B that connects to an ISP. You create a static default route to the ISP. Can the NSSA Router-B still inject the...
Greetings. I have a quick question that I haven't been able to answer in a CCO article:When you have an OSPF ABR, and you configure it with the default-information originate command (without the "always" option) will that ABR stop injecting the defau...
Haven't gotten definite confirmation on what interfaces the bandwidth statement absolutely affects QOS yet, but I did get confirmation that it is ignored on MLPPP links. We also confirmed that the bandwidth allocation is dynamic based on what links a...
Thanks, Srinath.I have some emails going on this topic and the responses vary quite a bit. From what I understand, the behavior of control traffic is dependent upon platform and even code version. For instance, on 7500-series or 6500s, you do have to...
Well... the search continues. I have now emailed our Sales engineer asking for clarification about when the bandwidth statement is, and is not, relevant. I pasted your snippet in the email - thanks for that.We recently had a Cisco engineer onsite to ...
Thanks, both of you. It seems I have baffled quite a few people with that statement from the book. As far as I can tell, the bandwidth statement is relevant for sub-rate interfaces but not for standard or aggregated interfaces. This makes sense in a ...
thanks for the help and input, everyone. I did some testing during the maintenance window. One thing I established: The forward-address was showing as 0.0.0.0 in the database for nssa-external (seen from the distribution router). If the firewall had ...