Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am testing the throughput offered by the POS-STM4 card on 2 7304 connected back to back. What I can see is the throughput(layer2 Bit rate) is not reaching the desired level(I am expecting it to go upto 599Mbps. The second thing which worries me is ...
Hi,I am simulating a simple scenario in the LAB. Two routers connected back to back with a framerealay PVC. Ethernet interfaces UP. Ethernet and Loop back in the routers are advertised by OSPF. OSPF and LDP router ID are the Loop back IDs Every thing...
Hi,I have a BGP concept related query. What is the special thing there in BGP which makes it capable of handling lakhs of routes. Can any other IGP like OSPF/ISIS tuned to handle any such high volume routes comparable to BGP?thanks and regardsAshish ...
Hi,I am working on a redundant internet setup. I have got 2 ISPs for ease of understanding lets say ISP A and ISP B.I dont have my public IP segment registered. I have got a /24 subnet from ISP A. Can I run the BGP session with ISP A and ISP B with p...
Thanks for your reply. i dont think router performance is an issue. 7304 NSE-100 is capable of handling 4Gbps of bidirectional traffic. And I can see only 20% of PXF and RP<10% being used. More over I tested this with 12000 GSR also which yilds simil...
one more addition..CPU/PXF doesnot seem to be the limiting factor in this because PXF and RP utilization are below 20%. Any help on this is higly appriciated.#regardsAshish
Hi,Ya you are right. Lable filtring was configured and unfortunately the ethernet subnets were out of range of the filter.thanks again for your helpregardsAshish
Hi Yash,Check with ISP1 whether they are doing route Aggregation/summarization and if the AS path information are being advertised intact by them to their upstream.thanks and regardsAshish
