Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
This may be a dumb question, but I would like someone else to confirm that the lightweight APs who are connected to a WLC cannot have individual "allowances" made. For instance, I cannot implement MAC restrictions on one AP in a given area versus the...
Hello All, Just quick confirmation if you please. When a wireless client associates to an WLAN controller any DHCP requests are forwarded on by the interface defined in that WLAN's properties right? I remember reading somewhere that the DHCP requests...
Hello All, I have a WLC running 3.2.116.21. It is trunked with dot1q and the specific VLANs are allowed. I have defined an interface (call it Outside) for vlan 100 and assigned it an appropriate address. Also the defined DHCP server is a Cisco router...
We have an open access SSID that supplies no DHCP services. The valid network range is to be the ip address of autoconfigured clients (namely Microsoft's 169.254.x.x). When I associate to the WLC no problem. My client settles on an address (with the ...
I wanted to know if Cisco ACS in any way extends the Microsoft Active Directory schema. I'm thinking not but co-workers want some sort of comfirmation. It's simply an authentication request that either gets accepted or rejected right?Thanks for the i...
Thanks Scott for even taking the time. It is appreciated!I created a WLAN for deployment to a specific AP but cannot find this WLAN Override feature. Could you specify where and how this would be configured. I have WLC 4402 LAN controllers with S/W :...
Okay, found out what it was. Just not sure why. In no way related to DHCP issues. Noticed that when I statically assigned an address I still could not communicate. So, after some floundering I deselected static WEP as the security mechanism and used ...
Hello B,Yep, we have two 4400s, each had an interface in the 169.254.x.x address space. They could ping each other but not the clients. In what way was the bug related? Thanks, Andrew
