Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Looking at your release notes, I would be described as an advanced user, and I appreciate that most of the changes are not aimed at me. However, there are a couple of features that seem to have been removed from v4 that just make my life a bit more d...
We use RADIUS proxy with a host of different devices. I have been troubleshooting a problem with a Raritan PDU and their tech support. When I authenticate directly with MS NPS it works fine but authentication fails with the DUO proxy.
It transpires t...
Our servers are configured to have all internet access blocked unless specifically whitelisted.
I recently setup DUO proxy. We already had access to our our API link whitelisted, https://■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ but DUO proxy wouldn’t work correc...
I am using Duo Proxy with Radius authentication to authenticate SSH logins for Cisco routers. The secondary authenticator is radius; Microsoft’s NPS
I have specified ‘pass_through_all’ in the radius server settings in the config but no attributes are...
Thanks for confirming that.
I have put in a feature request as suggested but obviously there is no guarantee that it will be implemented or in what timescale.
I’m not sure I quite understand what you mean by your question samuraizero but I will have a go at an answer.
When you install Duo Proxy you have to configure an authproxy.cfg to tell Duo Proxy its settings. The client_ip_attr=NAS-IP-Address goes in ...
I’ve had a request to share the ‘fix’ and having given it further consideration I can’t see why it would cause any issues. Please bear in mind this has not been fully tested by DUO yet but worked for me.
Add the below under the [radius_server] sectio...
Unfortunately our equipment doesn’t return a hostname or any other useful unique identifier.
I opened a support case with DUO. There is now a solution for this issue but it is currently not documented while it undergoes further evaluation. As such, I...
I thought you would do the “we do not comment on future product development” but you can’t blame a guy for trying! It was use of “currently” that got me curious.
I’m pleased you have taken the comments on board and clarified your online documentation...