Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,I have a large access list of host networks that I wish to deny on a Cisco 1941 ISR. The list is about 9000 lines of subnets, but I'm sensing that an access-list this large would make the router grind to a halt.This deployment uses the zone fir...
Hello, I think I have run into a massive bug with IOS 15.I've been trying to get a 1941 (SEC-K9) router that has a 4-port EHWIC-4ESG-P module configured for a few days now.I have everything working as planned - SMTP, IMAP, DNS are all fine from the o...
Greetings all:I recently purchased a 1941 with a EHWIC-4ESG-P. I've spent some time reviewing numerous docs and haven't found the answers to some of the questions I have in configuring this guy. Here is the topology I'm trying to support (IP's change...
Hi Peter,I just ran a few tests in clamping the MSS down to 1452 and allowing ICMP and it seems to work. I have to head into the office and will tweak this a little more when I get home this evening.Best
Hi Peter,Yes, once the no ip mtu on the Dialer was removed, the web server was able to negotiate MSS and the http traffic began to serve. I also find this a bit odd, as I thought I configured the Dialer interface correctly with an MTU value of 1492.T...
Hi Neeraj:I'm fortunate that Cisco TAC was able to resolve the issue. The problem turned out to be a hardcoded MTU of 1492 on the Dialer interface, which, when removed fixed the issue right away. This MTU value was recommended by the ISP however for ...
I'm wondering now if there is some issue triyng to NAT one of the PPPoE static (inside global) address I have been allocated. EDIT: Actually, that doesn't make sense as I can translate them to my mail and dns servers just fine.Another thought is, eve...
