Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Related to this post: [Home Network] Motorola NVG510 (IPDSLAM) IP PassthroughAnybody setup passthrough mode of the Motorola NVG510 router ATT makes you use with U-Verse to a CISCO 877 or similar, with a block of public addresses they want to use?It ...
I am a routing hack, not professionally trained in Cisco terminology, so bear with me. I currently have the Cisco 877-K9, full details at the bottom of this post (and current config attached) It supports DSL directly, and we have a lot of things con...
I've got a realtime application that uses a particular port, say, 9000 for inbound and outbound UDP traffic. Since I have off-site users that can use up all my outbound bandwidth at times, when they do this, the realtime app suffers. I would love t...
I have a router that NATs for internet access, but also must NAT differently through a VPN tunnel. I know I could use a "pool" of addresses for going through the tunnel, and that worked fine, but I really need "static" mapping of the addresses.I too...
Using Wireshark, I see the issue is when doing a TCP/IP connection to the CUCM via SIP protocol/port, it connects to the server, the server acks, but then instead of sending the first request of the SIP protocol, the Jabber client sends FIN, ending t...
See http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26895551-Cisco-877-NVG510-IP-Passthrough-block-of-public-addressesI got some help there. Turns out there is no reason to use Passthrough mode in the NVG510 at all. Here is what I did, as described in the link ab...
Odd. I could not add to interface atm0.1 I did not write down the error, but it said it could not be put on a subinterface. So I put it on the ATM interface, but while it is there, some counts at the bottom of this report make me think nothing is ...
Well, I configured no fair-queue and then applied the QoS policy, but not all at once, and here is what it said at that time:r12(config)#int dialer1r12(config-if)#service-policy output App-QoSI/f Virtual-Access1 class pri-app requested bandwidth 200 ...
Ok, I'm almost there...I now have: class-map match-all pri-app match access-group 101!!policy-map App-QoS class pri-app priority 200 class class-default fair-queuepolicy-map mark-app class pri-app set precedence 5 class class-default set prec...
