Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I'm trying to upgrade a 1720 router Flash carad. I bought a16MB card for it. If i place the card in and try to boot, it boots to ROMMON1. Tried the confreg proceudre and all, but still couldnt boot. I booted the router with the old flashcard and it's...
I have been trying to set up an Access Control List on a Cisco 1841 router. I can see that a basic ACL isnt exactly rocket science, but this just doesn't seem to work. By "doesn't work" I mean that as soon as I apply the ACL to an interface, i immedi...
I am using 1841's at 4 locations, and 3 of them are acting as DHCP servers. For the purposes of VLAN with our VOIP system, I'd like the routers dhcp servers to be able to recognize and ignore certain tagged frames, as is done using scope options in M...
I have generally managed my routers by telnet connection to their WAN IP address. They have always been accessible by WAN or LAN address to a telnet connection. Rarely I would log in via the SDM. One of my routers suddenly is inaccessible using eithe...
Figured it out with help from the flash card vendor. Ill post results in case anyone else has this problem;The IOS version was 12.0 (4) T and was too old to be able to see 16MB of flash card. To get around it, I had to load a newer IOS directly into ...
Thanks for the reply Mike. I should have thought of trying that before, but unfortunately, it didnt work anyway. Apparently its not a valid command in this IOS version c1700-y-m v12.0(4)T. I just get "invalid input detected" when trying to squeeze fl...
Understood. I posted a link to gif showing the very basic topo structure in my first post, were you able to get to that? Perhaps it didnt show enough detail. In any case I will take your suggestions to heart and try this a couple of different ways af...
Ok, seems like I understand. I should be trying to apply the ACL to interface FA0/0 (10.1.1.3) instead of to interface FA0/0/0 (192.168.240.3). Could this be why the ACL is locking out all traffic regardless of the permit list?