Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Could not find DS-X9648-1536K9 in CCW, neither in End-of-Life bulletins.
Does anybody know wheter this module is still available?
Thanks in advance,
--
Celso
I know that new WiFi7 access points uses the new unified licensing, but is it also possible to use existing DNA licenses?
If not possible, is there a (cost-effective) migration path from DNA to unified licenses?
Is it necessary to change the MTU for SVL links in a scenario in which interfaces are configured with MTU larger than default 1500 bytes?Traffic could flow between chassis through SVL links in a Stackwise Virtual cluster. Could not find any reference...
In a mixed 9300L/9300LM stack, is Stack-T3A cable compatible with C9300L-STACK-KIT connector?
Conversely, is Stack-T3 cable compatible with C9300L-STACK-KIT2 connector?
I received an 9300LM and can say that the connectors are mechanically incompatible.
Stack-T3A cable will NOT plug into C9300L-STACK-KIT adapter port, and STACK-T3 cable will not plug into C9300L-STACK-KIT2 adapter port.
@Giuseppe Larosa , TAC excused themselves from giving the technical reasons.
It must be a very good and an unavoidable reason because Cisco put existing 9300L customers in a very difficult situation.
I would like to warn everyone that the C9300L-STACK-KIT2 used by C9300LM uses a cable that is incompatible with C9300L-STACK-KIT which is offered to C9300L switches.
Therefore, it is not possible to simply add a C9300LM into an existing C9300L stack ...