About ithelpdesk

ithelpdesk · 10-26-2014

I have attached diagram. I want to route traffic from certain host to host using policy based routing. Basically traffic from host 10.87.6.151 should route through next-hop 10.87.6.3. Traffic from host 10.87.1.151 should route through next-hop 10.8...

ithelpdesk · 08-16-2012

Okay I hope I can sound straight forward with this question. I have site to site VPN setup with a client. This is my ipsec gateway 199.178.216.5 (outside interface). I gave them encryption domain of 199.178.216.5. Here is what my nat command statem...

ithelpdesk · 10-28-2014

Ok call me crazy; I applied this policy first to both side and traffic was routing properly between 10.87.6.101 and 10.87.1.101:*****Lebanon Site B*****route-map OHIO permit 20 match ip address 111 set ip next-hop 10.87.1.3access-list 111 permit ip h...

ithelpdesk · 10-28-2014

I was under the assumption that the PBR had to be placed on both sides in order to work correctly. You are correct traffic is between 2 servers at each site.

ithelpdesk · 10-28-2014

Ok good to know. lsgabrillo, can I apply the policy map to VLAN 10 on both site A and B? when I applied last week I lost connection to Site A core switch.

ithelpdesk · 10-28-2014

I was told that I had to apply the policy to different interfaces, meaning it can't be applied to interface vlan 10 on both sides (exit of of different interface). So without the SLA in place what would happen to the traffic if the next hop is down?

ithelpdesk · 08-27-2012

One more question; can I have another VPN tunnel nat to the same address 199.178.216.5? When I try to add the following statement: nat (inside) 2 access-list nat-to-newvpntunnel I get this message "Only one access-list can be associated with each N...

Member Since	‎08-15-2012 12:40 PM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:55 AM
Posts	8

User Statistics

User Activity

Policy Based Routing

NAT with VPN

Ok call me crazy; I applied

I was under the assumption

Ok good to know. lsgabrillo,

I was told that I had to

NAT with VPN