Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi guys,
just a simple HSRP load-balancing question:
got only one vlan (10) and want some of the clients to route to DG on router 1 and the others to route to DG on router #2. devided the clients to two groups and configured the routers - but someth...
Hello everyone,
This is a totally newbie question but here it goes...
In some places it is written the L2TP, PPTP and GRE are types of vpn tunnels, so for example you can create a L2TP dialer and (after authentication) it will form a L2TP tunnel, whi...
Hello everyone,
been searching all over these forums and also read some text-books, but still I can`t find a good, decent and simple explanation about the cost changes in the peering neighbor over frame relay. I know how to do it , I know why you do...
Hi everyone,
having some trouble understanding the frame relay and ospf netowrks.
so I set up a hub-and-spoke lab. all the routers are on different networks.
the hub has two sub-interfaces, both multipoint and the spokes are configured as sub-interf...
Hi guys,
what if I don`t want to use the "frame relay interface dlci" command with inverse arp on my sub-interface on a frame relay topology?
I want to map the dlci to the IP address in a static manner on the sub-interface (multipoint) using the "fr...
Hi Peter,
You are very much correct. when using this vpn method, the provider supply you with a 172.20 IP address, which is the provider`s local-inner network, and according to your destination request forward you to the internet or leaves you inside...
Hi Peter,Well, I did some searching around and it seems the only place on this planet where you need an PPTP/L2TP connection to your ISP is in Israel and Ukraine. this is when you are on a cable infrastructure, and only for low speeds (30mps or less)...
yes, Richard, you are right. the thing is I tries to use the physical interfaces rather than the sub-interfaces, thinking that maybe vlan is causing some sort of clash, so the original question was with sub-interfaces 192.168.0.2 and 192.168.0.3 and ...
of course, with GLBP it`s no big deal, I can also use vlan`s to separate the groups and it would work find with HSRP, but I just wondered why is it happening...
Hi Richard,the hosts are able to ping the "physical" DG with no problem, they can not ping the virtual DG given to them by HSRP. I corrected the track issue (as seen by the input of my last replay) but that wasn`t the problem. when no HSRP is configu...
