Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,Has anyone ran into this senario before. Before anyone answers with "move your WAE off the user subnet", it already has been.I have wccp 61 redirect in on the user subnet (gig0/0.83 of a dot1q trunk). The WAE is on gig0/1. Before I apply wccp62 to...
Hi,I have packet captured showing all of my GRE packets with an IP PREC of zero, and the internal header marked IP Prec 5. Every document I've read states GRE copies the internal header upon encapsulation. I've removed every QOS except the LAN inb...
Hi - We have a VPN deployment as follows. 2 headend devices connected to the spokes via GRE w/IPSEC. The remove users behind the spoke IOS router can surf the web fine; however, intermitant problems (page can't be displayed error" when accessing int...
That doesn't make sense to me. Bandwidth is used for metric calculation, and would have no impact on tunnel bouncing... you could set it to 1 or 1000000 and nothing would change other than the route metric.
That is exactly what my syslog message looked like.I was told by a Cisco engineer w/ CCIE that it should be fixed in 12.4.13, but that wasn't out last I checked.The bugId is listed in this thread, but when I look it up on CCO it won't give the detail...
Hi Mike,Actually, we found the looping packet is a bug in the 12.4.12 code. The router doesn't realize the packet is destined for itself. As far as I can tell, it only impacts telnet requests from directly connected hosts.As for the WAE being multi-h...
Thanks for your help. Does this just affect telnet access to the router? When I do apply WCCP to both the datacenter and lab sides, I lose complete TCP access to the lab subnet.Is there a url for the bug? When I look it up, I get "Sorry -- The def...
