Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am about to set up a MX spoke at SiteA where a firewall will be in front of it, and I have MX Hub at SiteB with another firewall. The Hub is set up as a one armed concentrator so all traffic from spokes will traverse to SiteB (if I'm not mistaken)....
I currently have a building that has existing MS225s and MR36s that I want to add C9300-Ms and CW9164Is to. Is this a bad practice? I haven't found any documentation on combining the new equipment with the old equipment. Would there be drawbacks in c...
Yesterday I was attempting to change my Camera SSIDs bridge mode from "External DHCP server assigned" to NAT mode. When doing this, the Meraki cameras started to give alerts of "Gateway warning (IP address conflict on uplink)". I changed the camera S...
Recently I have wanted to make my trunk connections from switch to switch more secure by only allowing the necessary VLANs. I wanted to remove the Native VLAN from the Allowed List (for VLAN hopping) but came upon Meraki documentation that advises to...
Ahhhh.Yes, it's peering with the device it's connected to and that device is advertising the default route. So I would most likely need to stop advertising that default route to the hub, set the spokes I want to full tunnel by checking "Default Route...
I don't have it checked currently on a spoke and in its routing table, the default route is set to the SiteB hub. I also attempted a traceroute to microsoft.com and it traversed to the hub.
