Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello together,We are currently implementing Access Manager in our environment. However, some of our sites are deployed with a single MX appliance only, utilizing its LAN ports and integrated MX-W wireless capabilities.I would like to ask whether the...
Hello Team,We are trying to adapt the Access Manager to our organization and we successfully did so for EAP-TTLS ( authN via username and password ) however we're experiencing issues with authN via certificate ( EAP-TLS method ). We have followed the...
Hi everyone,I am working on a setup involving three separate stacks of MS225 switches, which I plan to connect directly to MX250 devices configured in an Active-Passive mode. My approach is to connect two uplinks from each stack—one to the Active MX2...
Thanks for your quick feedback @Karsten Iwen , tbh I was actually more curious about whether this feature will be introduced on MX devices in the near future as well. However, I understand that this information may only be available through Meraki Su...
Hi @alessandrodematos & @Philip D'Ath,Thanks for your valuable answers. We discovered that we were trying to validate a user group match in Entra ID at the same time as the machine certificate. This didn't work, likely because the machine certificate...
Hi @Karsten Iwen ,I didn't understand the fact that if we remove the connections to the existing/old CoreSW on the right, why it should still create inferior BPDUs as you mention ? On the other hand, when you advise to create new VLANs for the new si...
Hi @Karsten Iwen ,Thank you very much for this great article. However, I would like to ask one more thing. We do have a parallel CoreSW connected as per below, and that's why we are doing all this since we want to smoothly transition from the old sce...
Hi @Philip D'Ath ,Thanks a lot, that's what I was thinking as plan-B but it seems I have to go with it directly as the topology described above is quite dangerous. Moreover, I would like to ask one more thing. We do have a parallel CoreSW connected a...
