Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
hi,so I have a remote site, it's using meraki APs, specifically MX46.I have 1 radius in HQ, we're using microsoft NPS and 1 radius in the remote site, so local to the MX46.when from the dashboard I try to test the radius connection to the nps in the ...
hi,I'm attaching a picture that explains it all.in a nutshell I have 2 hubs and I connect spokes to both hubs.HUb1 is first and Hub2 is second in the spoke hubs list.I need a way without doing any manual entry in the cisco core network for the networ...
all config is correct.in the nps on the HQ side in the nps logs, I see success from the mr46 that can connect, it's as if the others that fail don't even hit the nps.no packet capture so far as to not sure what I'm looking for.my client is 10.0.0.0/8...
yes but I have some spokes primary with hub1 and some spokes primary with hub2.if I make 1 hub more desirable with bgp in the meraki hub directly then I end up with asynchronous issue again.so let's say I say hub2 is less desirable with bgp and one o...
my other solution is to take my HUB1 which is actually a cluster of 2 test MX105 (active/passive) and split that into HUB1 and HUB3. I make HUB3 ospf lower priority advertisements as you show in the screenshot on top. then 1 spoke will connect to eit...
it won't work on the hub, if I change the cost of the ospf on the hub itself then that hub is either better always or lesser priority always. yet I have some spokes that prefer that given hub.seems to me only way as you say is directly on the core. b...
