Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am using the AXL SOAP API to provision CSF devices for our Jabber users. We've just upgraded to CUCM 10.5.2 from 8.6.2, and i've decided it would be good practise to start setting the owner on the device.If i'm provisioning a *new* device via addPh...
I'm trying to do the above, specifically i'm trying to use AXL to automatically provision an analogue phone device on a specific port of a known VG224, but i'm running into problems (we're currently using CUCM 8.6, with the intention to upgrade to CU...
I was looking at the configuration for PLAR here:http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/8_0_1/ccmcfg/bccm-801-cm/b03dn.html#wp1338158but it's causing me some problems. Specifically, if the directory number to be rung is in a pa...
We've got 2 Cisco 3900 routers running IOS 15.0(1r)M13, with a number of ISDN cards in them, as our voice gateways to our telephony circuit provider. This last month, we received a significant bill for one specific call through one gateway. On furthe...
(TL;DR at the bottom)We're in the process of rolling out VoIP across our campus. The network is divided up such that we have a router per building (about 20 buildings on site), off each of which anything from 10 to 40 edge switches hang depending on ...
That does indeed work. The WSDL, however, does specify that it should be possible to reference with UUID. It works for addPhone, and when doing a getPhone the UUID is populated on the relevant element of the returned object.I'll edit my library so th...
This was taken from SoapUI loaded with the 10.5 AXL WSDL downloaded from our test CUCM publisher, and directed at said publisher:getPhone:<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ns="http://www.cisco.com/AXL/A...
Do you mean specifically via AXL? Because i've got a CUCM 8.6.2 install here on which I have successfully configured a VG350 unit with one 48 port card and one 72 port card via the web interface. It does not, however, list the VG310 or VG320 models w...
So I gave up trying to do this using pure AXL calls. I managed tog et a copy of the document in question. and it was using specific updateVg224 AXL calls, which don't work properly if I have a VG350 or whatever as it doesn't see the subunits correctl...
So this seems to be the same setup that Yosh suggested, and it works fine. However I am going back and looking at the Cisco official documentation I linked and it definitely seems to be saying I need a different setup (for example it says in Step 4 t...
