I totally agree. I switched to ruckus unleashed and disabled the WiFi and regret getting this WiFi “model.” It appears Cisco has gotten too big and is focusing on profit over customer satisfaction.

This would make more sense if you had 4:4 instead of 2:2 in the MX65w to handle a remote site solo.

Seriously?! we are doing a test on our remote sites and this is a deal breaker. What garbage. Why make a security device to vpn to main branch that doesnt fully integrate with your existing product.

/bump Any luck with this? Would love to get softphones working over directaccess