I do not see any issue as long as CE knows how to treat the return traffic from respective networks.By adding two static entries to null0 for /24 and /29 you are creating two network entries for same subnet.It’s ideal approach when you have to advert...
Saran, You can achieve your objective using below method -eBGP peering between R4 and R5 can be established on non-directly connected or loopback interface IP.In AS 200 (iBGP peering will be stablished) you will need to activate route reflector clien...
You will need to provide more information like logs, diagram with port detail, existing spanning configuration etc. Also the issue is with all traffic on access switch or is with any particular VLAN. The packet drops are continues or intermittent the...
Please provide more information like R1 current configuration (Interested in NAT and routing configuration), also the subnets assigned for access points and IP phone's (Assume all are on private range).How do you want to separate them, here you have ...
Hi - With first scenario please use the different NAT global IP i.e. 172.16.20.1 instead 172.16.23.1.The problem is in R3 since you are using 172.16.23.0 /24 subnet to interconnect as well as for static NAT. R3 is not routing traffic back to R2 since...