About pcaddict1

pcaddict1 · 03-10-2011

Here is the scenario: I am to establish a L2L VPN. When trying to determine what hosts on my inside network will be accessing hosts on the remote network through the VPN, I can't seem to get a straight answer from those in charge.My thought was to ...

pcaddict1 · 07-30-2008

I am fairly new to the PIX and have spun my wheels long enough. I have a L2L VPN tunnel set up between a PIX 506 and a PIX 525. The PIX 506 is running 6.2(2) of the PIX OS and is the remote peer. The PIX 525 is running 7.2(3). The tunnel is up be...

pcaddict1 · 03-11-2011

coto.fusionet wrote: Also, you can still provide Internet and local access as normally.... Internet access: nat (inside) 1 172.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 global (outside) 1 interface I see what you are saying and thank you for the help. I marked it as correc...

pcaddict1 · 03-10-2011

Thank you for the reply and explanation. It did clear things up a little. Typically I do use a NAT 0 ACL. It's just this particular L2L VPN that is giving me fits. I am running 8.2.I think where I am getting messed up is that my hosts could be on...

pcaddict1 · 07-31-2008

Never overlook the obvious. I called the remote site and found out that the Windows Firewall was turned on. We don't typically turn it on so it was the furthest from my mind. Once Windows Firewall was turned off, I could ping the PC. Thanks for the...

pcaddict1 · 07-31-2008

Apparently, that command is not supported in version 6.2(2). I just get the usual keyword list after typing the command and pressing Enter.

Member Since	‎03-10-2007 09:21 PM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:56 AM
Posts	6

User Statistics

User Activity

Policy NAT, Static NAT, and L2L VPN

IPSec L2L Not Passing Traffic

Re: Policy NAT, Static NAT, and L2L VPN

Re: Policy NAT, Static NAT, and L2L VPN

Re: IPSec L2L Not Passing Traffic

Re: IPSec L2L Not Passing Traffic