Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,We are planning to upgrade two of our Catalyst 6500 switches to version 15.1(2)SY1 Advanced IP Services.The switches have dual supervisors and are currently running version 12.2(33)SXI11, but we have faced some issues and also would also like to e...
Hi,We are trying to implement multi-vrf and policy based routing on a Catalyst 3750-X. We have tested the same configuration on a Catalyst 6500 where it works without problems.However, on the Catalyst 3750 if we try the following configuration and ap...
Hi,We have two Nexus 7000 switches in the core and a number of Nexus 5000 and Catalysts connected to them.I noticed that the default "mac address-table aging-time" on the 7000s is 1800 seconds, while the default value on 5000s and Catalyst switches i...
Hi,I have a question regarding sorry server configuration on the CSS 11500 series.Is there a way for the sorry server to ignore the URL path and always send the user traffic to the "root" page (e.g. index.html) of the sorry server web server?The prob...
Hi,One of our customers is having a major problem with their Oracle ERP system which we are hosting for them. They have a high priority service request open which Oracle, who believe that our Cisco CSS 11501 load balancers has a problem with session ...
Hi Peter,Thank you very much for the additional information!The F5 supports ACLs, so it would be an option to use those, but in my opinion it would be more difficult to manage. It would have been very nice if it was possible to map community private ...
Hi Peter,Thank you very much for your great explanations!I have two follow-up questions;1. Why are only isolated private VLANs (and not community private VLANs) allowed on isolated pvlan trunks?2. We have one community VLAN for each customer. I would...
Anyone out there already running version 15.1(2)SY1 in production? It would be great to get some feedback on that version, but I am leaning towards suggesting 12.2(33)SXJ6 for next upgrade.Thanks again for your help!
Hi Amit,Thank you very much for your feedback!The reason that we want to upgrade is that we have an issue that has caused traffic black holing through the secondary supervisor. TAC has not yet been able to identify the issue, even when we have reprod...
Hi Giuseppe,Thanks for your answer!The reason why we need the policy-based routing is that we need to seperate customers coming in through a shared VPN solution and based on their source address send them to the correct VRF.If we cannot get this work...
