Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi guys,Perhaps you could help me with an answer to the following predicament:An SP rented us an MPLS line of 2 Mbps.Through the line stress tests we came out with 1.85 Mbps.He states that this is normal due to header information.150 kbps lost only d...
Hi guys,My question is more along the lines of "is there any warning in Cisco's documentation about this", because I don't recall during my CCNA courses ever seeing this.From what i remember, both these options were valid and usable when configuring ...
Hello,I have a Cisco 1841 Router, with the IOS version c1841-ipbase-mz.124-3i.bin. I have a static NAT entry in the running config, such as:ip nat inside source static 10.0.0.1 77.77.77.77The network layout is attached. Whenever someone in my interna...
Hy experts,I have the following configuration: a 1841 Cisco Router, IOS ver 12.3(4) and two internet providers, each configured with it's own public IP, which is NATed.I used "route-maps", so is the primary connection goes down (in the sense that the...
Thanks for the quick answer,I actually filled up the bandwidth and kept it filled for about 15 minutes when I did the show interface and it reported the 1.85 Mbps.I also did an end-to-end test with iPerf and it reported the same values.Could you plea...
Hi,Thanks you for the answer, but I am still a bit confused as to why did you take into account the MPLS label ?When the provider rents me a 2 Mbps line i expect 2 Mbps coming out of the PE router (outbound interface to my CPE), not the interface to ...
Hi,I think what you're looking for is IP Source Guard .http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swdhcp82.html#wp1335312You can restrict based on the IP DHCP Snooping database and/or sta...
If you say a user brought it to work, I assume it's one of those cheap-o, 3 for a buck, home-user switches. Those don't have spanning tree. All the switches in the topology need to have spanning-tree enabled. I believe what happened was the dumb D-Li...
Okay, the situation is a little bit more complicated that illustrated in the schematic. The original question was: "How do I disable DNS doctoring", but I guess I owe an explanation, so I don't look like an idiot Ok, of course i have an internal DNS...
