Basically in my setup, I have AS65501 and AS65502. AS65501 / AS65502 know all but a couple PEs from each respective AS (Provider exported some routes for Inter-AS Option C L2VPNs). Thus, I would some support of the RPF vector to alleviate some of...
See attached Physical TOPO.CE(s) AS is 65100PE(s) AS is 65501CE1 vrf 100 (vrf lite) peered to PE1 vrf 100CE2 vrf 100 (vrf lite) peeredto PE2 vrf 10.CE1 is advertising 11.100.0.0/241. At PE1; we see the route. Since CE1 originated the route; its AS_...
Not supported on IOS-XR:Cisco Reply: "We do not support origination or termination of rpf-vector in IOS-XR today, for global table (BGP-nexthop) and Inter-AS Option B case". Thus you would need to expose the PEs addresses of ASx in ASy and vice ver...
Found this to be a real good overview of VPLS:http://www.h3c.com/portal/Products___Solutions/Technology/MPLS/Technology_White_Paper/200804/602787_57_0.htmA decent good datacenter solution paper:http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-gu...
blau grana,Much appreciated for finding this. After applying to the ipv4 unicast address family the routes are as expected:RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CE2-ASR9K-AG04-4#show bgp vrf 100 ipv4 unicastFri Mar 15 15:28:52.649 ESTBGP VRF 100, state: ActiveBGP Route Di...
blau grana,The problem I'm seeing, in IOS-XR its not advertising down to the CEs without as-override.CE1 sends route to PE1 (11.100.0.0/24). PE1->PE2.PE2 never sends to CE2. I turned on allowas-in at CE2 before the thread write-up. The only option...
http://www.shafagh.net/2009/10/ccie-sp-bgp-as-pe-ce.htmlsimilar to what is being attempted, except for IOS-XR..... Looking through the config now to see if anything differs.