Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I'm wondering if anybody has ever encountered this kind of issue before. I have a 1941 that I got an RMA on. We'll call that Router A for easer of understanding. I have another router, Router B, which is also a 1941. I have cloned everything on Route...
Have a SLM2024 Switch that I need to connect to 2 HP Switches. The HP Switches have a trunk between themselves and can communicate fine. They are not stacked switches.I want to setup a network connection to each HP Switch, but do not want to create ...
Have an RV042 with an IPSEC tunnel to a site with a public IP range for their internal network (192.20.20.x). Our network is a 192.168.1.x subnet.The tunnel shows as connected but when we do a tracert from our network to the 192.20.20.x network - it...
CISCO891#sh runBuilding configuration...Current configuration : 7694 bytes!! Last configuration change at 20:49:10 UTC Mon Mar 31 2014 by xxxxxxxx!version 15.4service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service passwo...
I already had Cisco Support create, enable and verify the Zone Based Firewall. The GRC Shields Up test still reports the ports as "closed" or "open" - no "stealth".
Thanks guys. This is for a dedicated point-to-point connection with 10Mbps.Just to clarify - does this need to be applied to the inside & outside interfaces - or just the outside?
If possible, we would like TCP 3389 & 3399 traffic to have priority over all other traffic - and use up to 50% of the bandwidth. But we would also like the other traffic to be able to use 100% of the bandwidth if no TCP 3389 & 3399 traffic exists.Wi...
