Hi All,
I need your assistance to check if the following configuration going to work and are there any drawbacks/caveats?So far I identified OSPF convergence time and impact on a relatively large area 0 *(legacy design).
Solution details:I have ACI M...
Hello all,
I really need your advise.
I have a legacy network with multiple routers connected. Most of them in the Area 0.
I have ACI multipod with 2 pods to migrate to.
What makes it tricky is:
2 sites (single core switch for each) (A,B) need to be ...
Hi Guys,
Could you please advise if my thinking is correct.
I'm preparing for migration and the core will be replaced by firewall. I need to estimate the throughput requirements.
I've run show hardware capacity fabric-utilization and got the result ...
G'day everyone,
I'm building the ACI Multi Site. There are 2 DCs connected via Dark Fiber (DF).
I have 2 switches allocated to build an ISN. There are going to be a few other services *(L2 only) to use DF as well, such as FW HA, LB HA etc.
I decided ...
Hi Everyone,
I'm deploying the MultiSite ACI for one of the customers.
The cusomer has a naming standard.
I'm a bit confused about choosing the names for the spines and leafs.
I have 2 sites: Ballarat and Midland
From the management perspective I ten...
Hi Robert,
Thank you for your reply. The reasoning for L3 is for ISN/ACI MultiSit purposes only. As for L2 I need to connect a few systems between DCs bypassing ACI:
Firewall HA links *(data and control)Load Balancer HA linksSince the firewall is ac...
RedNectar and M02@rt37 thank you very much for your input and advice.
The sites won't be too large 2xSpines, 4-6xLeafs. But there might be several of these in the future.
I will see If BAPrdSp101 type of naming can be approved.
