Hi teamassuming that I'm not an expert in development area and especially in APIs I got a question from a financial customer that I really don't know how to address. Question raised from this linkhttps://developer.cisco.com/site/user-data-services/ov...
Hi teamassuming that I'm not an expert in development area and especially in APIs I got a question from a financial customer that I really don't know how to address. Question raised from this linkhttps://developer.cisco.com/site/user-data-services/ov...
Hi team.I'm not an expert here and sorry for the silly question.My customer would like to understand if via SIP LUA or other ways it could be possible to "mantain" the "Via" header field when routing a call across CUCM.this the scenarioPhone -- > Exp...
Hi Marksorry for the delay in getting back to you, I have been stuck with other urgent topics on the same customer.Thanks for the honest feedback. I will try to make customer understand the same. Their security team is very challenging, I am also fac...
Hi Adrienne.Sorry for the delay but I have been stuck for a while with other urgent topics for the same customer.Actually I got a feedback from a colleague that effectively there are some resources that for some reason don't require authentication an...
Thanks Mark.Despite MRA requires authentication before they are worried about the fact some resource access is not checked whilst other resource access it is.My lack of knowledge on UDS doesn't allow me to reply to them in a comfortable way as I also...
The objective is to maintain the original "Via" header filed to be able to keep track of original IP addressing information.I'm wondering if it would be helpful to build a script that replace the outbound SIP invite "via" header field with the same o...
The SIP INVITE comes from an Expressway configured as MRA. In this scenario there is NOT any SIP trunk to CUCM. Expressway is in theory seen as "SIP line" or "endpoint".