Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I may have phrased the topic not too clearly, but I have an external domain name of mail.company.com , I want my users INSIDE the company be able to also get to https://mail.company.com , currently they cannot (nothing loads, looks to me as if firewa...
I have 3 locations that are interconnected with an MPLS type of cloud provided by an ISP , it is transparent to me , currently I have all inter company traffic working but only site 1 is able to reach the internet. I'm running out of ideas and could ...
I realize this is just a small business switch, basically a rebranded Linksys, but I'm out of ideas as to why I'm only getting 200Mbits/s- 48 port - 10/100/1000 , set to standalone mode- 3 separate PCs on this switch , all are fast machines with Core...
Great article, wish I found it through google currently I have this NAT: global (EXTERNAL) 101 interfacenat (PROTECTED) 0 access-list PROTECTED_nat0_outboundnat (PROTECTED) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0---many other static commands----static (PROTECTED,EXTERN...
Should I try the DNS rewrite on my inside,outside NAT rule or the inside,inside as armando mentioned? and thank you for the split DNS idea, I will look into this as I am not too familiar with it.
I have added an inside,inside rule as you specified but same result , still am unable to get to mail.company.com from inside. after, I have also added an access rule (just in case) to allow any source on inside interface to public_IP for "https" (I ...
that is great to hear Varun. Thank you for the offer and I definitely wasn't implying that cisco would leave us hanging, but if it's a routing problem then it enters that gray territory of whose problem it is The remote routers utilize BGP so it's ...
