Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Marius Micodan
Stats
Member since
10-17-2010
10
Posts
5
Helpful
0
Solutions
03-18-2014
11:57 PM
Thank you for your help! I have re-activated the zoneset and the new WWN's was used. Is no full zoneset configuration. I have one more question - on the Nexus 7K switch if i initiate the 'show run' i see after the 'zoneset activate name Zoneset_VSAN3 vsan 3' the lines configured by me for the new WWN: zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 If i initiate 'show zoneset' i see also only these new lines but no all the other zones. If i initiate 'show zoneset active' i see all the zones . Question: i must commit something here in order to include the new lines under the zoneset configuration ?
... View more
03-18-2014
12:11 PM
On the Nexus 5K is used fc-alias. In Nexus 7009 are mapped directly the WWN's to the zones. Is not used enhanced zoning. How can be activated the zoneset without disruptions ? How can be commited the changes on the nexus 7K switch ? Below are the requested outputs for the zones that use the new pWWN's. ============= N5596-01 ========== ! N5596-01# show zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 fcalias name vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 fcalias name vfc1401 vsan 3 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N5596-01# show zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 fcalias name vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:68:3e:e4:37:28 fcalias name vfc1401 vsan 3 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N5596-01# show zoneset zoneset name Zoneset_VSAN3 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 fcalias name vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 fcalias name vfc1401 vsan 3 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 fcalias name vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:68:3e:e4:37:28 fcalias name vfc1401 vsan 3 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N5596-01# show zoneset active zoneset name Zoneset_VSAN3 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 * fcid 0x770000 [pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28] pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:17:81:91 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 * fcid 0x770020 [pwwn 50:06:01:68:3e:e4:37:28] pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:17:81:91 ============= N7009-01-FCOE ========== N7009-01-FCOE# show zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N7009-01-FCOE# show zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N7009-01-FCOE# show zoneset zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28 pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:25:ed:59 ! N7009-01-FCOE# show zoneset active zoneset name Zoneset_VSAN3 vsan 3 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spa11 vsan 3 * fcid 0x770000 [pwwn 50:06:01:61:3e:e4:37:28] pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:17:81:91 zone name vfc1401_vnx1_spb10 vsan 3 * fcid 0x770020 [pwwn 50:06:01:68:3e:e4:37:28] pwwn 21:00:00:c0:dd:17:81:91
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Storage Networking
in Storage Networking
03-18-2014
07:33 AM
03-18-2014
07:33 AM
Hi All, I hope to be there someone to quickly help me with the below issue. We have to change a network card of one sever that is connected to two Nexus 5000 switches. Our Storage environment is a multihop FCoE => each NEXUS 5000 (where the hosts are aggregated) is connected to a Nexus 7000 (where the Storage is linked) On the Nexus side is configured zoning. After the server network card was changed, the asociated WWN was changed too. To update the zoning configuration i have changed under each zone the old WWN with the new one. Now i have two issues: 1/ On the Nexus 5000 switches if i initiate 'show zoneset active' i see the old WWN still used under the zone even if in the running-config is the new WWN. Is any configuration steps order that must be made or is not possible to change a active zoneset configuration ? 2/ On the Nexus 7000, FCoE VDC, the new changes are not commited if i try 'zone commit vsan X'. The new zone settings are added at the bottom of the configuration after the line 'zoneset activate name Zoneset_VSANX vsan X' but are not commited. And here is the same output of the 'show zoneset active' command for the new WWN. I will appreciate any detail that can help me to solve this issue. Kind Regards,
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Switching
in Switching
02-10-2014
12:05 AM
02-10-2014
12:05 AM
Hello, Problem solved after upgrade to the last version of NX OS 6.0.2.N2.3 BR,
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Switching
in Switching
11-05-2013
01:16 PM
11-05-2013
01:16 PM
Hi All, I have configured 1 vPC's between 2 Nexus 5596 and 1 stack C3750 switch. The links in the stack are distributed over both members. Gi1/1/1 -> Eth 1/44 NX 5596-02 Gi 2/1/1 -> Eth 1/45 NX 5596-02 Gi 1/1/2 -> Eth 1/46 NX 5596-01 Gi 2/1/2 -> Eth 1/47 NX 5596-01 The same logic is for another stack C3750 to the same pair of Nexus 5596 switches. The problem is that the links from the vPCs keep flapping at random moments - 1-2 times per hour. The network is not loaded at this time and the same issue is on both vPC's. the flaps in the nexus 5596 looks like this %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel108: Ethernet1/44 is down %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel108: first operational port changed from Ethernet1/44 to Ethernet1/45 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_INITIALIZING: Interface Ethernet1/44 is down (Initializing) %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_UP: port-channel108: Ethernet1/44 is up %ETHPORT-5-IF_UP: Interface Ethernet1/44 is up in mode trunk On the stack is just up/down the pair interface. I started few debugs on the stack and captured the folowing output: C3750X-02#im_if_stack_relationship_add: Posting the ACP job for stack add for 5018.10902 im_if_stack_relationship_add: Posted the ACP job for stack add successfully im_add_ifstackentry: higher_if_index = 5018 lower_if_index = 10902 im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to delete nolayerelem from NoLowerLayerTree for higher_ifIndex = 5018 im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to delete nolayerelem from NoHigherLayerTree for lower_ifIndex = 10902 im_add_ifstackentry: Deleted nolayerelems from NoHigherLayerTree and NoLowerLayerTree im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to insert stackelem into StackTree Jul 12 03:35:26.122: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/2, changed state to downim_if_stack_relationship_add: Posting the ACP job for stack add for 5018.10902 im_if_stack_relationship_add: Posted the ACP job for stack add successfully im_add_ifstackentry: higher_if_index = 5018 lower_if_index = 10902 im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to delete nolayerelem from NoLowerLayerTree for higher_ifIndex = 5018 im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to delete nolayerelem from NoHigherLayerTree for lower_ifIndex = 10902 im_add_ifstackentry: Deleted nolayerelems from NoHigherLayerTree and NoLowerLayerTree im_add_ifstackentry: Failed to insert stackelem into StackTree Jul 12 03:35:29.058: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/2, changed state to up Do someone have any idea what happens here ? The configuration is ok because i have another vPC connected to FEX's and is working fine. Kind regards,
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Server Networking
in Server Networking
08-21-2013
10:35 AM
08-21-2013
10:35 AM
Hi, We implementing OTV between two DCs, but the OTV adjancency don't come UP. In one DC is NX7Ks with SUP1 and in the second DC are NX-7Ks with SUP2. It's possible to have problems because the OTV should work between equiments with different supervisors? Kind Regards,
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Intrusion Prevention and Detection Systems (IPS - IDS)
in Intrusion Prevention and Detection Systems (IPS - IDS)
02-19-2013
01:22 PM
02-19-2013
01:22 PM
Hi Robert, I Have the same issue like Tiwang with SSM-10 modules. The modules it's running with last version of E4 - 7.1.(6) but i can't update to the last signatures. I am stucked to S689. I tried to upgrade from local server or online but did not succeed. The process starts OK , the IPS unzip the file and start to install the update. In the end the IME show that CPU is 100% , in sh ver still S689 it's in use, the Health status it's ok and with sh tech i not see any errors But the statistics for analysis-engine, anomaly-detection and virtual-sensor cannot be completed. After restart/reload i am back to S689. The licences are valid. Best regards, Marius
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Firewalls
in Firewalls
02-07-2013
11:41 PM
02-07-2013
11:41 PM
Hello, All ok after reimagine with 6.2.1599.0 version and upgrade the last available version. Best regards, Marius
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Firewalls
in Firewalls
02-04-2013
01:32 AM
02-04-2013
01:32 AM
Hi again! I planning to move up to the latest version on 6.2 train - 6.2.1559.6. Now, our CSC module have 6.2.1599.0 version. To be on the last version i must perform only incremental upgrades or i can go strigt to .6 version ?
... View more
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Firewalls
in Firewalls
01-30-2013
01:32 AM
01-30-2013
01:32 AM
Hello, I manage one CSC from one of my customers. All ok with this module except updates for PhishTrap pattern. I reset and restarted the module. CSC have valid licence and no warnings about Maintenance Agreement. Pls help me with some ideas about what operations to do next. I tried to do this operation manualy but stil receive in Update tab the output that packet 1012 it's available but failed to update to this version. In TmuDump file log i see that this .zip file it's downloaded and CSC try to merge with current file (1011) . I attached the part with this step from log file and sh ver output from CSC. Many thanks in advance !
... View more
Labels:
03-18-2014
Thank you for your help!I have re-activated the zoneset and the new
WWN's was used.Is no full zonese...
03-18-2014
On the Nexus 5K is used fc-alias. In Nexus 7009 are mapped directly the
WWN's to the zones.Is not us...
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Storage Networking
03-18-2014
03-18-2014
Hi All,I hope to be there someone to quickly help me with the below
issue.We have to change a networ...
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Switching
02-10-2014
02-10-2014
Hello,Problem solved after upgrade to the last version of NX OS
6.0.2.N2.3BR,
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Switching
11-05-2013
11-05-2013
Hi All,I have configured 1 vPC's between 2 Nexus 5596 and 1 stack C3750
switch. The links in the sta...
Created by
Marius Micodan
in Server Networking
08-21-2013
08-21-2013
Hi,We implementing OTV between two DCs, but the OTV adjancency don't
come UP. In one DC is NX7Ks wit...
02-19-2013
Hi Robert,I Have the same issue like Tiwang with SSM-10 modules. The
modules it's running with last ...
02-07-2013
Hello,All ok after reimagine with 6.2.1599.0 version and upgrade the
last available version.Best reg...
02-04-2013
Hi again!I planning to move up to the latest version on 6.2 train -
6.2.1559.6.Now, our CSC module h...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 10-17-2010 12:54 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-15-2019 11:36 PM |
| Total Messages Posted | 10 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 5 |
