Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello!I recently installed SP6 for 4.3.4. The three mandatory SMUs were installed before that, so all went well. After the activation of the SP6 pie, the pie was both in active and in inactive list. After removing all inactive PIEs and SMUs the final...
Hello, I am using 4.3.2 on asr9k and I am trying to run NG-MVPN with P2MP-TE using BGP-AD and BGP c-mcast using the ipv4 mvpn address-family without success so far. I want to run MI-PMSI with SSM. According to the release notes this is what is suppor...
Hello, I am playing with mLDP for NGMVPN implementation and I noticed that when I enable LDP over the MPLS TE tunnel, the mLDP neighborship is up via that tunnel, but no binding and no route in the MPLS forwaring p2mp table is createdThe question is,...
Hello, Does anyone knows how to see more detailed information for bgp ipv4 mvpn prefix in IOS-XR. When I type "show bgp ipv4 mvpn summary" I see the prefixes received:RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:XR#show bgp ipv4 mvpn Thu Oct 31 14:55:33.649 BGTBGP router identif...
Hi all!Does anybody have any information regarding such feature/implementation. Any info regarding this would be much appriciated. Thanks, HristoCCIE# 38272
Hi, Elnur!I want to add that our customer ended with this exact solution - ACL with ~2k prefixes managed manually or semi-manualy with some scripts etc. It is ugly solution but it works so far.CheersHristo
Hi, Elnur!I got confirmation from cisco that QPPB is not available nor currently planned to be implemented for BNG subscriber sessions.HristoCCIE# 38272
Hello, jomihuertas!The strange behavior when using OSPF over fabricpath is most probably caused because of the way FP deals with Multicast Trees. Especially with the default behavior of the Multicast ECMP. I had a scenario in one vrf OSPF on SVI FP s...
Hi, JC!Thank you for the great info. Can you please share in which versions this bug is fixed CSCse46790 It is not visible in the BugToolkit. Thanks in advance,Hristo
Hi, Oteros!It is supported for sure! In you case you can simply route with static route statement the Lo0 (the default next-hops of the VPNv4 routes) via the TE tunnel you want to use. The other option is to use autoroute announce feature. For exampl...
