Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Is there a way to preserve the source port for UDP packets that use a PAT pool?Here is what I need:The client (1.1.1.1) sends a UDP packet from port 5060 to port 5060 on our external 2.2.2.2. This packet is port forwarded to our internal server 10.10...
I have a CSS 11503 that we use to balance SIP calls(UDP) among our SIP servers.We have a content rule that balances the incoming traffic and a source group to NAT the outbound traffic. Both the content rule and the source group use the same IP addres...
We have 10 Cisco SG200-50 switches running firmware 1.1.2.0. The switches are used in a small data center where we are a tenant and the manager. The switches normally work smoothly with no problems. When the switches fail we experience packet loss...
That looks like it will work for 1 server. Can I get this to work for 2 servers?We are trying to load balance our SIP traffic through a CSS.Incoming traffic on 2.2.2.2 to port 5060 will get forwarded to the CSS's virtual IP 10.10.10.10 and it load ba...
I think this problem is unique to UDP. I assume there is an existing flow with the sourcenat when 1.1.1.1 responds. Is there a way get the CSS to use the flow in this instance instead of load balancing?
