Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, collegues!Strange behavior of shaper on port-channel sub interface.Here is configpolicy-map SHAPING class class-default shape average 50000000 service-policy SP-QOSpolicy-map SP-QOS class CRITICAL priority percent 35 class IMPORTANT bandwi...
Hello colleaguesThe problem is, that i have ~ 7-8 Mbps on 65Mbps link, but my service policy seems to drop packets according to queue size.In my understanding, policy map start to drop traffic only when congestion appear, is it so?same situation on A...
yep, we discuss it actually - a lot of interesting information about qos tuning was on this course. But not so much practice on real WAN in my case. But, as for me - it`s very interesting to work on network improvement!One more time - thank you for...
Joseph, thanks a lot for your help!I have only "QoS-FE:Implemeniting..." course as a background for QoS methods, and it was clear for me. But after your comments, i`ve understand, that sky is not so clean as i thought May be you can advice some hel...
But in case of FQ, you must describe all traffic very carefully. I mean:In case of WRED, in perfect world, i will not have monster flow - one random drop and our growing tcp flow decrease it speed. So all flow in one class will have they band in most...
all important UDP traffic (VoIP) goes to critical queue, so if any UDP goes to class-default (and WRED) -> int`s not so bad. Main traffic in class-default is TCP, so it`s ok.why do you prefer FQ instead of WRED? how it can replace WRED? Thank you for...
When you see WRED tail drops, you have an issue.Yes, on most of my links i didn`t see any tail drops, just random drops. This link - is one that have such issue. Strange thing is that - all my links have very simular traffic (web,ftp,rdp) and none of...