Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I understand some of This is not setup for redundancy I am just trying to connect so that EIGRP is working.
I have a setup with 2 N7K, distribution switch 3650 and 2 N9Ks. I have a VLAN 5 10.5.5.0/28
7K 10.5.5.2 and .3. 9Ks 10.5.5.13 and .12. Th...
I am trying to create a point to point layout between 2 sets of Nexus equipment. Normally you connect the connection directly into the device, but where this comes in it will connect to a switch on both ends for distribution and then connect to the...
I am creating a VPN with Cisco 5525-X to a Palo Alto. I am not able to ping or connect to anything on their side but they are able to ping and connect to my side. I have the VPN configured like other VPNs and recently created one the same was with no...
Can I have ikev1 and ikev2 both enabled for L2L VPN tunnels? I have not setup a ikev2 yet and just want to make sure I dont take down any of the other ikev1 tunnels.
I have a vendor that is asking for
Phase1:
Encryption: AES-256
Hash: SHA-512
DH: ...
I am working with (2) Nexus 7009 in my core and have (2) different ISPs using (2) different ASA's pairs for redundancy. I am running EIGRP for my LAN computers. I have a secondary Data Center that will be connected later but these DC are running inde...
I understand this is a single point of failure for both ends. We are only paying for 1 connection that will need to be terminated in the DMARC. Even if I was able to get the fiber up to the top of the building where the server room resides. It would ...
I have clients and servers on bother sides. This will be for an existing network to connect the 2 networks together. Each side has their own networks and servers. I would like to connect them with fiber instead of using VPN which is currently used.
The ASA was configured correctly. The Palo Alto Firewall was having problems with the NAT traffic when it hit there interface. I am not sure what he fix was for their side but after they had the service call, the tunnel was working with no changes to...
I have tried using just 10.18.31.32 as the only host in 5024_LAN with no success on my side Cisco but the Palo Alto site is still able to successfully ping the device. I feel like it is a NAT problem on the Palo Alto side.
object-group network S...
Yes they are correct. I change the original IPADDRs since this information would be public. 50-53 or the Original 4th octet addresses. I missed that.
object-group network Servers_18 description: | 10.18.31.30 - 33 Servers | network-object host 10....
