About didier.martin@arumtec.net

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 11-18-2020

Hi,I would like to know if it's possible through multi vrf, nat, to connect 3 identical subnets to a catalyst 9300. My goal is to manage these platforms from a unique subnet with desktops. I have tried to configure the Catalyst 9300 to test this, but...

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 05-14-2013

Hello,I'm using the cisco Nexus 1000v 4.2.1.SV2.1.1a in Layer 2. I'm unable to add host to the N1KV dvSwitch when using the VLAN 901 for control and packet. But when i use the same VLAN that ESXi mgmt, it works. I thought it was a problem of configu...

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 11-18-2020

Thank you. It corrects the configuration of my vrf. But is my goal is doable ? Is there an example of this kind of configuration ?

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 05-15-2013

Thanks,the nexus 1000v was not directly involved. I think a change has been made on switches after your answer because today it works.Thanks,Cedric.

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 05-14-2013

I only change the VSM nic 0 (control) and nic 2 (packet). nic 1 with management remain on the prod-esxi-mgmt.The only thing different between 202 and 901 is that 202 is routed.Network diagram are attached. Thanks for your help.Cedric.when i swap to v...

didier.martin@arumtec.net · 05-14-2013

Thanks,but the vlan 901 is my target vlan.The port-group "prod-control-packet" need to access vlan 901. 202 should be only for ESXi mgmt.When i test the use of vlan 901 for control packet, i swap the vlan to have :svs-domain domain id 1 control vla...

Member Since	‎05-14-2013 02:23 AM
Date Last Visited	‎11-18-2020 09:23 AM
Posts	6

User Statistics

User Activity

Catalyst 9300 and overlapping subnets

Problem with control/packet VLAN

Re: Catalyst 9300 and overlapping subnets

Re: Problem with control/packet VLAN

Re: Problem with control/packet VLAN

Re: Problem with control/packet VLAN