Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have a requirement to run specific application over our voice infrastructure using the G726r16 codec. We have attempted running this at G729 but it doesn't work, and the BW used at G711 is too much. G726R16 seems to be the lowest we can take thing...
I have been looking for documentation which states how many character you can display on the various phones LCD's. Does anyone know how many characters can be displayed on the 7940 and 7923 phones?
I am attempting to find out the number of message minutes you are able to store on the above two servers. I have seen a document a while ago with approximate message minutes stated in it, but I am unable to find this.Does anyone have any suggestions ...
I have been asked to provide a solution which can provide a fax gateway. We would like it to have two lines on it and we would prefer it to send the fax to the email address of the user after being recieved.Is this be possible with a 2600 with 2 FXS ...
We have a requirement to have authentication on a device (which can be handled by the ACS) but we also require that any commands entered on a device be logged somehow.How would one go about doing this?
I understand and know that rotuers can be controlled by the CM, but our problem still remains.The CCM doesn't understand or know about G726R16 as a codec. Our specific requirements are to use that codec for one FXS port.with MGCP, as a master/slave p...
I have found a document which relates the number of minutes depending on the server chosen and the compression used. URL ishttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps2237/products_data_sheet09186a008009267e.html
172.168.10.2 is the local address, 172.168.10.3 is the far end of that segment.When the interface is down (we pulled the plug) the local connected route dissappears (as it should) but the static we have defined (as detailed previously) remains. I did...
regretabilly, we do not have that situation. We have, as example, the following:ip route 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.248 172.168.10.3The reason we didn't go with a route out the interface port, is that the device at 172.168.10.3 is not allowed to do prox...
With resepct to the previous posting about WAN connectivity and 5 minutes, that isn't the case and won't be that short a timeframe.The entire WAN was stated to illistrate that this is not limited to one site, but to over 15 as well as the entire LAN ...