Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Router upgraded from 10.0.03.22 to 10.0.03.26. Under 3.22 everything was working fine and stable.What is 'everything', you may ask?- IPSec site-2-site VPN, GRE and RIP- Anyconnect - auth against local DB- Traffic direct to internet or, if in the VPN ...
Imagine my disappointment when reading the EOL/EOS documents and finding the entire RV series being EOL'd and no replacement from Cisco.https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/small-business-rv-series-routers/eos-eol-notice-c51-2655...
To clarify, setting the SAN to anything other than the "host common name" is required. Once you click on the SAVE button, you need to wait until the "Form submitted successfully" pop-up appears. Then at the main menu, Synchronization-->Accounts and w...
Update: I had opened up a TAC case with Cisco about this. After trying a bunch of things, collecting logs, different upgrade procedures, etc. etc. My case was passed up the line to a 2nd line engineer. After confirming a few things, I was informed th...
At this point we're looking at a Fortinet product. De FG-60E-POE has the necessary VPN throughput, POE, etc. but lacks the port density. The port density issue is easier to solve than the VPN throughput. Cost is about 30-50% higher than the RV345P an...
Thank you for the link. I had not considered Meraki. However, after reviewing the current offerings, I find that Meraki does not provide the same feature set in a single package. Only 1 model family, MX68, has PoE capability yet only offers 200mbit V...
