Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I found this particular configuration regarding redundant routing using VPN Concentrators. I am looking for a redundant solution for VPN LAN-LAN tunnels. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vrrp_config.htmlDoes anyone know if this configuration is ...
I want to allow ftp access from 192.168.10.10 to 192.168.20.20. So I setup a static route from the 192.168.10.9 to 192.168.20.20 and add an access list to allow the traffic from 192.168.10.10 through with the following commands: nameif ethernet2 hig...
Is it possible to utilize the uplinkfast feature with the following setup. Two core switches: Core switch 1 is the root bridge for vlans 2/3. Core switch 2 is the root bridge for vlans 4/5. These switches are trunked in a triangular topology with ...
I am not sure of your environment, but typically you have the concentrator interfaces as interfaces on a firewall. Once traffic passes from public to private, it then should need access to your inside network. This is the point where you would deny...
Yes, during the concentrator setup under config/system/tunneling protocols/IPSec/LantoLAN - under the tunnel you are configuring, there is a parameter "connection type" You will notice the variables to choose from are "bi-directional", "answer-only"...
Just a side note to this, the latency is too high to get consistent VPN connectivity when using satellite. I would imaging that TAC will defer to "support" this type of connection
Thanks for your reply, if you don't mind I would like to ask another follow up question. I can see the logic on how the first statement works, I cannot see the logic in how the translation to itself. I guess I'm trying to see how traffic is being al...
