Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have Catalyst 1000 switches at many of our locations. For new locations, we are no longer able to install this model because it is EOS. I found that the C1200 or C1300 switch are recommended as replacement models, but unfortunately they do not s...
Suppose I have a C9200 switch managed through the Mgmt port which is on a dedicated VRF called Mgmt-vrf. If I configure management commands such as SNMP traps, Tacacs, etc to send traffic to a host, do I need to specify the Mgmt VRF for each of thes...
I was told that ETS is supported on the Nexus switches, not Catalyst switches like the C9300. After looking at some ETS config examples on the Internet for Nexus, it looks no different than CBWFQ (or modular QoS) configuration on the C9300. In both...
I am just starting to study Enhanced Transmission Standard. It seems fairly simple in theory, but I cannot figure out the difference between configuring modular QoS on a switch port and ETS. I can allocate guaranteed bandwidth and strict priority q...
I'm trying to understand what is "facility" in Syslog messages. Please refer to the following link for this discussion:https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/wireless/software/guide/SysMsgLogging.html#wp1054470In the "System Log Messag...
This is a bit upsetting because it means I have no similar switch to deploy like the C1000. So my only option is the C9200, because it is the lowest end switch that has classic IOS with all the features we need. Thanks for your answer!
Hello Jens, it just shows a default route. What I said before about not needing the vrf name in the ping command was wrong. I made a mistake in the ping test I did. Everything is clear now.
True. But if I have an SVI, I can also ping a host on the SVI subnet which is in the GRT. I guess there is a different algorithm for icmp. Maybe it looks at both routing tables, and picks the most specific route. If both the Mgmt-vrf and GRT have...
Thanks for this example. But this is just CBWFQ which I can do on a C9300. I understand the hierarchy concept, and I suppose that the spoke-x classes are analogous to the groups in ETS configuration, is that what you're trying to say? What I'm try...
