Hi everyone,Here is our (very simple) network topology :- 3 switches : A & B & CA is the main switch (2970G) to which B (2970G) and C (2960S) are connected.- Between A & B : 500/600 Mbps pike bw- Between A & C : 400/500 Mbps pike bwThe problem is tha...
Good morning,I'm encoutering an interesting issue on two different CVPN boxes (Cisco VPN 3005 and 3020).The thing is, when remote clients connect to the VPN gateway using their Cisco VPN client, then cannot reach any of my LAN hosts for about 60 seco...
Hi,I'm experiencing troubles setting-up OWA 2007 access through VPN SSL.Clients can log-in to OWA portal but get an application error message with IE7 (not with FireFox).Can this be related/fixed to VPN 3000 configuration? As any of you ever tried to...
Hello,In order to set-up a new customer link between two buildings, we'd like to simulate a 25 Mbps connection between two servers connected through a Cisco 2950 switch.To do so, I tried to set-up a QoS policy as explained on this page : http://www.c...
Hi,In some cases, I get packets dropped whith the following reason :"Bad option length in TCP"Is there a way to create a TCP-Map to accept these packets anyway ?Thanks,Regards,Gaëtan
I've already tried setting-up the port with autoneg (no duplex full / no speed 1000).I goes UP at 1000-full-auto but we still get the same bad transfer rates.I'm really starting considering the 2960S as an "under-powered" switch for our need.
I don't think Multicast is a problem. I can see multicast packets on both ports on each side.Moreover, compared to other packets stats, there are very few of them and not supposed to create any problem.
#sh interfaces gigabitEthernet 0/18GigabitEthernet0/18 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0013.c3d7.f512 (bia 0013.c3d7.f512) Description: *** Baie 4 *** MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, ...
