Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I have applied QoS on the ATM interface hoping to improve the VoIP calls quality.interface ATM0.1service-policy input QoS-PM-Voice!ip access-list extended QoS-ACL-Voicepermit ip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.123.0 255.255.255.0! class-map match-all QoS-...
Hi,We will like to prioritize voice traffic for all softphones. The PBX is hosted at vendor's site, so we connect the softphone to an external IP of the PBX.I have scripted something below but not sure how to apply to interfaces as softphones are ins...
Hi,I can access to Cisco 3750 with SSH, but fail to login to web http with the same login.I am able to get the login prompt, the login error I get is "The server at level_15_access requires a username and password."Below is my switch config:username ...
Hi,I have configured SPAN for Cisco 3750 to monitor the VLAN traffic for a trunk port.What tools or command I can use to find out the total traffic for that vlan port?The smartport for Catalyst 3750 does not have port role Diagnostic.Is there a switc...
Hi John,I remove input from ATM interface:interface ATM0.1 point-to-pointno service-policy input QoS-PM-Voice service-policy output QoS-PM-VoiceBut I still get error:(config)#policy-map QoS-PM-Voice(config-pmap)#class QoS-CM-Voice(config-pmap-c)#prio...
Hi John,When I apply LLQ as belowpolicy-map QoS-PM-Voiceclass QoS-CM-Voicepriority percent 5I get error: Low Latency Queueing feature not supported in input policy.When I apply:class class-defaultfair-queueI get error:Flow Fair Queueing feature not s...
Hi John,Thanks for your reply.I have tried to read a bit more about LLQ and need your help to explain.policy-map QoS-PM-Voiceclass QoS-CM-Voicepriority percent 5 set dscp efclass class-defaultfair-queue1. why apply fair-queue on class-default (instea...
I have applied "service-policy input QoS-PM-01" to the uplink interface and notice there is no packet matching to the policy. But I do have packets matching the ACL for destination host 9.9.29.1.Can someone explain what is going on?Router887#sho poli...
