Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,In our organisation we have a IPSEC site-to-site VPN between our corporate Cisco ASA5510 and a Cisco ASA 5505 on a remote location.The VPN works fine, traffic is send between the networks.But on the remote location we have a windows server that...
Hello,I'm configuring a asa 5510.I have a dynamic NAT rule configured:NAT (INSIDE) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0global (outside) 1 interfaceOn the interface of the outside the IP adress 192.168.1.1 is configured.With only this config the PAT translation works be...
Hello,we have several cisco ce520-24pc-k9 access switches that all have two uplink connections to two HP Procurve 54012zl edge switch (one uplink to every HP switch).But the ce520 is standard using PVST+ as a spanning tree protocol, but the HP use Mu...
The problem was that the production line of the ASA firewalls had some major problems. The construct site was closed and had to move it to another location.The expectation is that the delivery is normal around juli.Best regards,Marcel
The problem is solved.It was the syntax of the packet tracer.it was not a physical problem.When I do a packet trace from the ASDM for IP trafficIt sends a 'rawip' command, this doesn't work for a PAT translate.Because a PAT translate needs udp or tcp...
Yes correct.when I remove the static it works again.It must indeed not affect the dynamic rule, but some how it does.I've tried a clear xlate but with no effect.Best regards,Marcel
That is the problem de ce520 uses Rapid PVST+ this is a cisco protocol so far I know.Rapid PVST+ cannot communicatie with an MST instance. The CE520 sets one of the two uplink ports in an error state.In the documentation of the ce520 they write that ...
