Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I am experiencing successive icmp built and teardowns with source and destination port(0) to the management interface. This might be a dumb question, but is this an attack? and I have ACL's on all interfaces to deny ICMP any ideas?
After the Primary failed the Standby has become the Active running over a month with new changes. Can the Standby force "write standby" to the old Primary pix before making the old Primary the Active?
a device that has been segmented on a vlan interface on the pix has been assigned a dynamic translation, but can't seem to get correct translation:here's a snap of the config:nat-controlnat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0static (Aspect-vlan,Outside) 146.7...
Did you find an answer to your issue? I've just experienced the exact issue with a pair of 4507-r in VSS mode to another pair of 4500-x in VSS mode L3 etherchannel. Configured LACP as well as PagP and same issue not able to ping between each other. ...
Thank you all for responding to this. It turns out that a logging statement on an internal firewall was firing to an old Syslog server and IP address. The address of that old Syslog server was of a subnet on the inside. Since this system was not resp...
The main concern was that the Standby unit running with a new configuration would be overwritten when the Primary unit came back online. I thought maybe the key from the UR unit could be transfer to the FO unit, but this is not possible. Somehow I th...
that is precisely what I was wondering. Thanks for confirming the process. The key thing is that the replication does not occur automatically when preempt is not configured.thanks very much for your response.regards,carlos
if the above can't be done does anyone know how much time the Standby with FO license is allowed to run before bring up the Primary with UR license online and making it the Active?Carlos
