03-08-2023 03:48 AM
Hi,
Basically this is simple question. But, I'm still confused even I have read document cisco ACI multisite whitepaper.
Basically, ACI use MP BGP EVPN (between spines) to build underlay between sites. Hence, it is needed to configure OSPF and BGP between spine and ISN equipment (let's say router).
Should i also use BGP-EVPN between ISN? I mean between ISN, not between spine and ISN. Or I can use any other routing protocol like IGP between ISN?
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-09-2023 08:40 PM
Hi,
I mean is it necessary to redistribute Endpoint prefixes? Is it enough only redistribute VTEP environment between 2 sites? My goal is only to achieve IP reachability between 2 sites. Endpoint site 1 can reach endpoint site 2 vice versa either endpoint reside in same or different subnet.
What is the consideration between redistribute all prefixes rather than only VTEP environment?
03-16-2023 09:47 PM
@sidshas03 @brlehigh could you help me to response this?
03-16-2023 09:58 PM
I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I know I've been really slow to respond to your message, and I'm sorry for that. I've been dealing with some personal stuff lately that's been taking up a lot of my time
03-16-2023 09:56 PM
If your goal is to achieve IP reachability between two sites and enable communication between endpoints, redistributing VTEP environment is usually sufficient. However, it depends on your network topology and the routing protocol you are using.
VTEPs are virtual tunnel endpoints used for encapsulating and decapsulating traffic over VXLAN tunnels. When VTEPs are redistributed, the remote site can learn the MAC addresses of the local endpoints and forward traffic appropriately. However, if the remote site has no knowledge of the IP subnets where the endpoints reside, it will not be able to route traffic to the local endpoints.
Redistributing all prefixes ensures that all IP subnets are advertised to the remote site, enabling it to route traffic to the local endpoints based on their IP addresses. This is particularly important if you have multiple subnets or if your endpoints are in different subnets.
In summary, if you only have a single subnet and you are using a routing protocol that supports VTEP redistribution, redistributing VTEP environment may be sufficient to achieve IP reachability between two sites. However, if you have multiple subnets or you are unsure about your routing protocol's capabilities, it is recommended to redistribute all prefixes to ensure that all IP subnets are advertised to the remote site.
03-16-2023 11:25 PM
Hi,
I'm still confused. In case of I want to advertise / redistribute endpoint subnet, how if there are multiple same subnet across sites. Let's say site 1 and site 2 has same 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24. I can't imagine how can routing protocol advertise / redistribute same IP subnet between sites. Site 1 will advertise 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24 and also site 2 will advertise 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.2.0/24, 192.168.3.0/24?
As far as i know, the unique IP address between sites is the VTEP. CMIIW
03-17-2023 10:28 AM
The spines do not advertise your overnlay network prefixes into the ISN. They only advertise the fabric VTEP pools and other TEP addresses that are needed to establish the Multi-site connectivity. The ISN is used for underlay connectivity between the fabrics.
I would recommend giving this document a read: Cisco ACI Multi-Site Architecture White Paper
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide