04-19-2023 12:09 AM - edited 04-19-2023 12:29 AM
Hi Team,
I have confuse about infra VLAN, Cisco recommend use 3967 or any vlan which no existing/overlap other platfrom.
My Question is: if I use vlan 3979 or any vlan id higher 3967, is it possible ?
(I think it's silly question) but if it's impossible, could you help share some brief explaination about risks ?
Thank you in advance !
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-19-2023 03:01 AM
Hi @ADC Lane ,
On a scale of 1 (unimportant) to 100 (VERY IMPORTANT) - the IMPORTANCE of actual VLAN you use for the infra VLAN probably about a 5 - VERY CLOSE to UNIMPORTANT
The risk? Well, you really need to be doing some special things to make the INFRA VLAN ID important
So, since no-one can tell the future, Cisco recommends a VLAN of 3914 or less - but NOT VLANs 1002-1005. And they are absolutely correct in doing so.
WHAT? You THOUGHT it was VLAN 3967 or less? Sorry about that - you forgot to consider that Cisco can change the rules at any time. Once upon a time it WAS VLANs 3967 or less, but that changes when the UCS 6400 series Fabric Interconnects were released! |
Let's deal with these:
So to put it statistically, your risk of having a future problem using VLAN 3979 as the infrastructure VLAN, based on the 3 use-cases above (my opinion only - happy to change my opinion if someone can come up with a better explanation)
Note: If you don't know what AVE is, read this post and mark it as helpful !
04-19-2023 01:31 AM - edited 04-19-2023 03:13 AM
check below comment
04-19-2023 02:05 AM
Hi @MHM Cisco World ,
Thanks for yours time to reply.
it mean I can use vlan ID (3968, 3979 ...) higher than ID 3967 for Infra VLAN ID in ACI ? no problem ?
04-19-2023 02:10 AM - edited 04-19-2023 02:13 AM
you mention ACI so check below link
Solved: Find all encap vlans configured & used - Cisco Community
N7K
N9K
04-19-2023 03:01 AM
Hi @ADC Lane ,
On a scale of 1 (unimportant) to 100 (VERY IMPORTANT) - the IMPORTANCE of actual VLAN you use for the infra VLAN probably about a 5 - VERY CLOSE to UNIMPORTANT
The risk? Well, you really need to be doing some special things to make the INFRA VLAN ID important
So, since no-one can tell the future, Cisco recommends a VLAN of 3914 or less - but NOT VLANs 1002-1005. And they are absolutely correct in doing so.
WHAT? You THOUGHT it was VLAN 3967 or less? Sorry about that - you forgot to consider that Cisco can change the rules at any time. Once upon a time it WAS VLANs 3967 or less, but that changes when the UCS 6400 series Fabric Interconnects were released! |
Let's deal with these:
So to put it statistically, your risk of having a future problem using VLAN 3979 as the infrastructure VLAN, based on the 3 use-cases above (my opinion only - happy to change my opinion if someone can come up with a better explanation)
Note: If you don't know what AVE is, read this post and mark it as helpful !
04-19-2023 05:13 AM - edited 04-19-2023 05:14 AM
Hi @RedNectar ,
Wonderful !!!!
Your explanation is excellence !
Thank you so so much for your time ! Hope best for you !
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide