10-25-2022 11:13 PM
Hi All,
May you please advise on the following:
We are currently busy with a firewall migration project that will be utilizing multiple vdoms.
The internal interface of the firewall will be configured with sub interfaces and each sub-interface ip address will be linked or assigned to a specific vdom.
From an aci routing perspective, there will be a vpc from x2 leaf switches to x2 firewalls. Static routes will be used to route specific traffic to the different sub-interface ip addresses on the firewall that will be utilizing the same vpc and l3out policy.
Is it possible to create a single logical interface profile and configure multiple svi's to a single path (vpc)?
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-25-2022 11:39 PM
Hi @DuaBell
You cannot configure multiple SVIs to a single interface part of the same logical interface profile. You get an error like this:
Error: 400 - Cannot create Leaf Port (l3extRsPathL3OutAtt); object uni/tn-SD/out-L3Out/lnodep-L3Out_nodeProfile/lifp-L3Out_logicalIfProf/rspathL3OutAtt-[topology/pod-1/paths-201/pathep-[eth1/17]] already exists.
This is simply because
However, you can use different LIP for each vlan. According to L3Out whitepaper:
when the same interface needs to trunk two different VLANs for two different SVIs, each SVI needs to be configured in different Logical Interface Profiles
What is more important from my perspective in your scenario, is to split each vdom in different ExtEPG. This way you can properly configure the policy enforcement.
Take care,
Sergiu
10-25-2022 11:39 PM
Hi @DuaBell
You cannot configure multiple SVIs to a single interface part of the same logical interface profile. You get an error like this:
Error: 400 - Cannot create Leaf Port (l3extRsPathL3OutAtt); object uni/tn-SD/out-L3Out/lnodep-L3Out_nodeProfile/lifp-L3Out_logicalIfProf/rspathL3OutAtt-[topology/pod-1/paths-201/pathep-[eth1/17]] already exists.
This is simply because
However, you can use different LIP for each vlan. According to L3Out whitepaper:
when the same interface needs to trunk two different VLANs for two different SVIs, each SVI needs to be configured in different Logical Interface Profiles
What is more important from my perspective in your scenario, is to split each vdom in different ExtEPG. This way you can properly configure the policy enforcement.
Take care,
Sergiu
10-25-2022 11:58 PM
Hi Sergiu,
So, basically you can have multiple SVI's to different paths in a LIP but not multiple SVI's to the same path in a single LIP?
Makes sense.
Many thanks for your valuable assistance.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide