08-10-2018 08:59 AM - edited 03-01-2019 05:37 AM
Hi,
I want to establish the multipod between the two sites, in the IPN in DC is N7K using VDC and in DR N9K, when i configured the jambo frame on N7K-IPN-VDC and on N9K-IPN but hen i try to ping from N9k or N7K point to point IP address i have drop as show below:
ping 10.10.1.13 df-bit packet-size 9000 source-interface ethernet 1/3
PING 10.10.1.13 (10.10.1.13): 9000 data bytes
9008 bytes from 10.10.1.13: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.793 ms
9008 bytes from 10.10.1.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=1.326 ms
Request 2 timed out
9008 bytes from 10.10.1.13: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=1.805 ms
9008 bytes from 10.10.1.13: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=1.562 ms
--- 10.10.1.13 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 20.00% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1.326/1.621/1.805 ms
the configuration on N7K and N9K:
N7k
system jumbomtu 9150
interface Ethernet 2/5.4
mtu 9150
encapsulation dot1q 4
vrf member fabric-mpod
ip address 10.10.1.13/30
N9K
system jumbomtu 9150
!
policy-map type network-qos jumbo
class type network-qos class-default
mtu 9150
system qos
service-policy type network-qos jumbo
interface Ethernet 1/3
mtu 9150
vrf member fabric-mpod
ip address 10.10.1.14/30
anyone has the same issue.
Thanks
08-10-2018 03:17 PM
It’s most likely control plane policing dropping some of the ping traffic.
08-10-2018 04:18 PM - edited 08-10-2018 06:03 PM
Hi Rich,
thanks for your update, could you please guide me how to change the default value and what is the suitable value, below the output:
class-map copp-system-p-class-monitoring (match-any)
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-icmp
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-icmp6
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-mpls-oam
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-traceroute
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-http-response
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-smtp-response
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-http6-response
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-smtp6-response
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-rise-nam-response
match access-group name copp-system-p-acl-rise6-nam-response
match protocol mpls
set cos 1
police cir 130 kbps bc 1000 ms
conform action: transmit
violate action: drop
module 1:
conformed 370931008 bytes,
5-min offered rate 56 bytes/sec
peak rate 718 bytes/sec at Thu Jul 05 03:59:06 2018
violated 712728 bytes,
5-min violate rate 0 bytes/sec
peak rate 2119 bytes/sec at Thu Jul 05 03:59:06 2018
module 2:
conformed 5868 bytes,
5-min offered rate 0 bytes/sec
peak rate 6 bytes/sec at Sat Jul 14 05:00:27 2018
violated 0 bytes,
5-min violate rate 0 bytes/sec
peak rate 0 bytes/sec
module 5:
conformed 43988265 bytes,
5-min offered rate 2 bytes/sec
peak rate 775 bytes/sec at Thu Jul 05 03:59:06 2018
violated 769524 bytes,
5-min violate rate 0 bytes/sec
peak rate 2565 bytes/sec at Thu Jul 05 03:59:06 2018
what is the correct value?
Thanks
08-10-2018 06:11 PM - edited 08-10-2018 06:12 PM
You don’t have to adjust it. In normal operation you won’t be having 9000byte flood pings hitting the CPU.
There is no ”correct” value. It depends on the network and what is normal.
08-10-2018 09:08 PM
But for IPN must ping without any drop so it should has a correct value.
08-11-2018 05:43 PM
The requirement is that the IPN needs to pass the packets without fragmentation being necessary. Sending pings between switches is just one way to verify this is happening. The fact that some pings drop due to CoPP will have no impact on IPN performance*.
*Unless CoPP is doing things like dropping adjancencies etc.
08-12-2018 04:12 AM
Thanks Rich for your update that mean if i don't modify the copp configuration there is no impact.
Thanks again
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide