05-12-2019 05:04 AM
Hi,
Is it possible to use static path bindings to extend 2 EPG , each on different BD on the same port of a leaf switch ?
Regards
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-13-2019 03:27 AM
Hi @AirBorn ,
So regarding my initial question, the 2 EPG could be linked to the same or different physical domain
Correct
Yes, that is correct. I could have run the scenario with two physical domains, in which case it could look like below, or I could have also created two VLAN pools (one for each Physical Domain). However, I'd recommend using the method I suggested in the first place unless there is a reason for splitting into two physical domains, such as if each VLAN were assigned to a different Tenant for instance.
05-12-2019 03:13 PM
Hi AirBorn,
Yes, as long as the Physical Domain of the port is assigned in both EPGs, and a different Encapsulation Vlan is set for each EPG.
Remi Astruc
05-12-2019 07:39 PM
Hi Astruc
As per my understanding , in ACI physical domains are assigned to ports not to EPGs. May be you are referring to the 2 Vlans that must be in the same physical domain. Right ?
Regardsm
05-12-2019 09:27 PM - edited 05-12-2019 09:28 PM
Hi @AirBorn ,
As per my understanding, in ACI physical domains are assigned to ports not to EPGs.
Not exactly. EPGs must be assigned to at least one VMM Domain or Physical Domain. For static mappings such as you describe, your EPG must be linked to one or two Physical Domains, depending on the Access Policy Chain that the physical port lives in. Suggest you google search my explanation of Access Policy Chains
May be you are referring to the 2 Vlans that must be in the same physical domain. Right ?
The two VLANs will probably be linked to the same Physical Domain, but that is not strictly necessary, each VLAN could be in a different Physical Domain, but unlikely. My example below will use one Physical Domain.
Suppose you have traffic on VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 arriving on port 101/1/15. You want VLAN 10 traffic to be classified into EPG1 and VLAN 20 traffic to be classified into EPG2.
Job done
I hope this helps
Don't forget to mark answers as correct if it solves your problem. This helps others find the correct answer if they search for the same problem
05-13-2019 01:59 AM
Hi Chris,
So regarding my initial question, the 2 EPG could be linked to the same or different physical domain
Correct
Regards
05-13-2019 03:27 AM
Hi @AirBorn ,
So regarding my initial question, the 2 EPG could be linked to the same or different physical domain
Correct
Yes, that is correct. I could have run the scenario with two physical domains, in which case it could look like below, or I could have also created two VLAN pools (one for each Physical Domain). However, I'd recommend using the method I suggested in the first place unless there is a reason for splitting into two physical domains, such as if each VLAN were assigned to a different Tenant for instance.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide